The thing is though, they don't do that in the many pro sports with a cap
Granted, these are typically sports with a players' union (one of the reasons I said that was better than a bunch of independent contractors), but I think it would be unreasonable to expect that cap space would get evaded with all sorts of unnaturally small contracts when it's not the norm in professional sports. I did leave off an item #4, because I think there'd be more opposition to it, but a draft replacing the typical recruiting process would also help. More issues to work through, though; who's eligible, what if they don't join the draft, do you also have free agency, etc.
In an ideal world, should ESPN (take this to be shorthand for all media entities) have as much of a say as they do? Probably not, but if I started typing out all of the deltas between the world as it is and the world as I think it should be, I'd be typing for days. Ultimately, ESPN is the single biggest source of money for college sports. Donations, sales of tickets and merchandise, all this is overshadowed by the volume of ESPN money. Even my hypothetical league scenario is not so idealized as to expect that the league or its constituent programs would have the fortitude to walk away from that money, at any moment, unless they got to fully dictate terms to ESPN.
Given the history of the NCAA as an overarching governing body, I would be somewhat skeptical that a Neo-CAA, now both an intermediary and allocator of that same ESPN money, would carry this out in a manner free of corruption or influence peddled alongside that money. It would probably depend a lot on its structure and governance. E.g., if Neo-CAA was basically just the ACC-Big10-PAC12, if each conference had some measure of veto power (but not unrestricted), it could help provide a buffer against changes peddled by outside influence.
|
(
In response to this post by 33laszlo99)
Posted: 04/09/2022 at 3:22PM