All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by

The Lounge Board

Beerman

Joined: 08/14/1998 Posts: 15797
Likes: 2053


That's exactly backwards


If commodity X cost $A(small), and commodity Y costs $B (large), then there's little incentive to buy commodity Y. But as $A increases, it becomes more worthwhile to buy commodity Y. It's the same reason extracting oil from shale is only worth it for relatively high cost barrels.

Right now the reason we have government subsidies for alternative energies is that they are not economically viable. But as the cost of oil increases, those non-fossil alternatives become more viable. If we were to (hypothetically) run out of oil entirely tomorrow, the price of what had already been pulled out of the ground would skyrocket, and people who couldn't afford it would go all-in on renewables, regardless of the cost.

(In response to this post by HokieSignGuy)

Posted: 03/08/2022 at 10:22AM



+4

Insert a Link

Enter the title of the link here:


Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:


Current Thread:
  That's why electric is ideal for multi-car families -- Baltimore Hokie 03/08/2022 2:26PM
  These are all points I would make too. -- HokieSignGuy 03/08/2022 11:09AM
  That's exactly backwards -- Beerman 03/08/2022 10:22AM

Tech Sideline is Presented By:

Our Sponsors

vm307