All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by

Conference Realignment Board

daveinop

Joined: 04/10/2003 Posts: 8165
Likes: 518


Unless they are showing re-runs, yes. (long response)


16 SEC teams will have less content to show than 14 SEC teams and 12 good ACC teams.

Look, I'm holding onto NOTHING. I'm an old die-hard Hokie that imprinted on VT football when we were beyond awful.

But professionally, I develop partnerships between state, federal, and private interests. I've completed several agreements that set national precedent and to get them done, I have had to make a couple of federal and state laws dance in ways people haven't envisioned.

Based on that experience, I'm just asking what I think are realistic questions. Somehow those questions are interpreted as me having some kind of agenda pro or con the ACC/SEC. And what I'm getting back quite frankly are idealistic answers based on what seem to be totally unrealistic assumptions.

The logic goes something like this

The ACC is a really bad deal. Therefore, if VT gets a good lawyer, it can get out; get back the rights it no longer owns; and make lots of money in the SEC. It will just happen because it's what we all want and is obviously the right thing to do. Yeah, just get a lawyer!

I/we used to make fun of Chuck because he thought you could do anything if you got a lawyer, like it was some magic answer. Get a lawyer. Find wiggle room. Get leverage. Like if you want a good deal, it just happens. If you want a TV network, you can have one.

My professional experience is that to get buy in, especially from competing interests, everyone has to see some benefit. You have to check everyones' box.
So if we think an ACC collapse is a big winner for ESPN, we should be able to articulate why this is.

"Oh, it's like the Big 12!". No, it isn't. If anything (at least so far), the Big 12 example is one that reinforces following the letter of the current contracts. So why would the ACC follow a different scenario? And if so, what is that scenario likely to be?

To me, it makes MUCH more sense for ESPN to proactively facilitate the changes it would like see in the ACC. It is co-owner of the ACCN. It can renegotiate the TV contract on a whim. So why not do that? Why go the meltdown route and burn bridges that don't need to be burned? I can say with certainty that if the politician (or chief of staff, or committee staff) you need is a die-hard alumnus of the school you just screwed, you're toast; don't bother to even ask for an appointment.
[Post edited by daveinop at 08/08/2021 3:07PM]

(In response to this post by Stech)

Posted: 08/08/2021 at 3:07PM



+1

Insert a Link

Enter the title of the link here:


Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:


Current Thread:
  I don't see ESPN wanting to do that. -- HOO86 08/08/2021 3:13PM

Tech Sideline is Presented By:

Our Sponsors

vm307