All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by

The Lounge Board

VTHokie2000

Joined: 01/01/2005 Posts: 33818
Likes: 12458


I know the purpose of NATO. Also, I would hope they are true to their


word that they would come to the aid of another NATO member who is under attack. I am just not as convince that support means sending soldiers to the country under attack. It would not surprise me if some of the countries opt to send either equipment or money as their form of support. Heck the US did it in both World Wars until it was forced to get involved in them.

(In response to this post by Hokie1992)

Posted: 03/03/2022 at 12:11AM



+0

Insert a Link

Enter the title of the link here:


Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:


Current Thread:
  I can think of one reason it could grow -- Tafkam Hokie 03/03/2022 08:58AM
  "...my, phone!" ** -- bourbonstreet 03/02/2022 7:59PM
  General Petraeus on CNN -- TabbHokie 03/02/2022 8:50PM
  Sending troops to the Ukraine or enforcing a no fly zone…… -- CrystalCoveHokie 03/02/2022 7:36PM
  You are assuming that with nuclear on the table -- HokieForever 03/02/2022 8:28PM
  …shoulda stopped him at Munich -- chumley 03/02/2022 8:20PM
  Fuckin-a ** -- HokieNerd 03/02/2022 8:22PM
  Nuclear weapons make it a completely different situation…… -- CrystalCoveHokie 03/02/2022 7:44PM

Tech Sideline is Presented By:

Our Sponsors

vm307