All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by

Conference Realignment Board

VTHokie2000

Joined: 01/01/2005 Posts: 33818
Likes: 12458


Interesting because it could be a fine line between rejecting a


candidate for valid reasons vs. discriminating against that same candidate. Let's assume that ODU wanted to join the ACC. Let's also assume UVA and VT both refused to support ODU for legitimate reasons (i.e. academics, research, etc). They may have even go as far as to check with the other members to see what their views are about ODU joining the conference. Most likely ODU would be told by someone "You are not a good fit for the ACC" and they may have even expanded upon that statement to give supporting reasons. Where things could start to get fuzzy is when a rejection goes from being just a rejection to discrimination.

One of the reasons given for why the ACC doesn't want WVU in the conference is WVU doesn't meet the ACC's academic requirements. Even though it may be a valid reason isn't that also discrimination since the conference doesn't want any members that are academically below a certain threshold?

(In response to this post by HOO86)

Posted: 05/13/2016 at 12:33PM



+0

Insert a Link

Enter the title of the link here:


Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:


Current Thread:
 
  
David Boren is backpeddling on Big XII Expansion -- HOO86 05/13/2016 02:24AM
  Probably, and UMASS applied for ACC Membership -- BigCrumpy 05/13/2016 11:03AM
  Given the way the ACC bylaws are currently written -- VTHokie2000 05/13/2016 12:09PM
  That isn't "discrimination" as defined today -- mrcaniac 05/13/2016 2:37PM
  Who knows -- mrcaniac 05/13/2016 9:27PM

Tech Sideline is Presented By:

Our Sponsors

vm307