All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by

Conference Realignment Board

Marooned

Joined: 10/09/1999 Posts: 2094
Likes: 271


Re: Seen This Article?


What a fluff opinion piece that was. No research, no attempt to understand what drives ratings, how universities or conferences behave, and certainly no attempt to justify the magic #64.

Rather, every conference should be viewed through the prism of trying to improve the lot of all its members, with some input from networks and consultants. The means to do that make some more predatory than others; but only temporarily. No university administration wants to deal with the peer and public fallout from these upheavals any more than necessary.

(In response to this post by carlosphat)

Posted: 03/25/2016 at 08:23AM



+0

Insert a Link

Enter the title of the link here:


Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:


Current Thread:
 
  
Seen This Article? -- carlosphat 03/24/2016 01:55AM
  Test for response location ** -- 134106Hokie 04/04/2016 5:20PM
  Here's a couple of key weaknesses in the article -- VaAkita 03/26/2016 01:48AM
  Re: Seen This Article? -- Marooned 03/25/2016 08:23AM
  Re: Seen This Article? -- 33laszlo99 03/28/2016 10:40PM
  Re: Seen This Article? -- Vippie1 03/24/2016 12:18PM
  Something to consider is the 16-member conferences -- VTHokie2000 03/24/2016 12:36PM
  16 teams would be far more regionally based... -- jesuisvtguy 03/24/2016 3:54PM
  I agree that it would be regionally base. Except the 4 -- VTHokie2000 03/24/2016 4:21PM
  I believe you misunderstood my post. The WAC -- VTHokie2000 03/24/2016 11:07PM
  Good post. Thank you. ** -- jesuisvtguy 03/26/2016 8:47PM
  Well done -- BigCrumpy 03/24/2016 11:16AM

Tech Sideline is Presented By:

Our Sponsors

vm307