Well, first of all, if it wasn't your intent to draw a connection between
recruiting rankings and draft position, why did you include draft position in your original post?
Second, recruiting stars are not, as far as I know, intended to demonstrate who will be productive and who won't. They are intended to reflect readiness for FBS ball.
What result from your analysis would have led you to the conclusion that recruiting rankings aren't BS? I'm curious what result would've convinced you that recruiting rankings are useful.
This just strikes me as sort of sloppy, highly qualitative and subjective, and based upon a conclusion you had likely already reached in your mind.
There are far more rigorous ways to analyze this sort of data and answer these kinds of questions with greater clarity and objectivity.
|
(
In response to this post by Flanker)
Posted: 12/22/2021 at 7:52PM