All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by

Conference Realignment Board

wwhokie1

Joined: 01/01/2005 Posts: 3131
Likes: 2152


I still don't think many schools would financially add enough, even if the


SEC were considered a "national property". With cord cutting, and the fact that few schools have national appeal, most schools would contribute on a much smaller geographic scale. Certainly, that would help expand the geographic appeal of the SEC, but they already have enough name schools to have national appeal. Whatever additional regional appeal a school such as VT, for example, would bring, is not going to be enough to justify the financial cost. Essentially it would be a net loss for all schools involved. I have not seen numbers showing how any of the vast majority of remaining schools would bring in enough money to be of benefit. If VT, UNC, UVA, etc were worth that much to the SEC, then the ACC deal with ESPN is vastly undervalued. Any school the SEC adds needs to bring in at minimum 100 million. The entire ACC brought in about 455 million in its most recent reported year, and that is with Clemson. How many individual ACC schools are worth 100 alone?
[Post edited by wwhokie1 at 08/11/2021 5:41PM]

(In response to this post by VTHokie2000)

Posted: 08/11/2021 at 5:41PM



+0

Insert a Link

Enter the title of the link here:


Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:


Current Thread:

Tech Sideline is Presented By:

Our Sponsors

vm307