All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by

The Lounge Board

hokiehill1117

Joined: 09/03/2014 Posts: 3634
Likes: 2797


This NY Time article (via yahoo news) actually provides a few good notes


comparing the two. unfortunately alot of it is saying the sample size for coronavirus is too small, relatively speaking, and the information is too incomplete to have a clear sense of how it compares to the flu. Here are a couple of notes:

The seasonal flu kills about 0.1% of people who become infected. Early estimates of the coronavirus death rate from Wuhan, China is around 2%, down to roughly 1.4% if more parts of China are considered. This number could skew even lower with mild symptom-free cases that have not been detected (though my guess is the same is true for seasonal flu).

The coronavirus DOES seem to be more contagious with estimates that one person with the virus appears to infect 2.2 other people on average, vs. 1.3 for the seasonal flu. Of course, that number is skewed by early mismanagement of the virus. People in both cases may also be contagious before symptoms appear making this data hard to establish.

Other tidbits:
- the seasonal flu seems to have more of a negative impact on young children than the coronavirus.
- with the coronavirus, the death rate for older men is notably higher than older women, perhaps due to the fact that chinese men typically smoke more than man (compromised lung function).



(In response to this post by AbsolutVT03)

Link: How does Coronavirus compare to the flu


Posted: 03/02/2020 at 1:01PM



+0

Insert a Link

Enter the title of the link here:


Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:


Current Thread:

Tech Sideline is Presented By:

Our Sponsors

vm307