If the ACC ends up being the only conference to rotate divisions
then it could quickly become the black sheep of the power conference family. The Big Ten, Pac-12, and SEC teams don't consider every division game to be a "rivalry." Only certain games are considered to be "rivalry games" for a variety of reasons. If they are fine with fixed divisions, then it shouldn't be a problem for the ACC too. Now I am not saying your complaint about having better matchups isn't justified because it is justified.
However, the ACC brought it upon itself by not establish a more true zipper model, balancing out the public football schools a little better, and by structuring the protected cross-division pairings to be true rivalries. The BC-UMD rivalry would have been the only artificial pairing at first, but would have eventually gone away with the addition of Pitt and Syracuse. Syracuse would have been paired with BC and Pitt with UMD.
|
(
In response to this post by chuckd4vt)
Posted: 08/17/2016 at 12:39PM