No decision was made on the 9 game, shelved it for awhile ** -- goldendomer 08/12/2016 11:02AM
My imperfect solution -- Vippie1 08/11/2016 10:17AM
Actually, something like this is what the NCAA rejected. No ACC love there. ** -- chuckd4vt 08/11/2016 10:45AM
Conferences voted it down, led by Delaney ** -- Red Hokie 08/11/2016 2:02PM
And at the same time, they hooked the Big12 up. ** -- chuckd4vt 08/11/2016 3:01PM
THIS. And any additional "rivalries" can be played OOC. ** -- chuckd4vt 08/11/2016 10:42AM
Teams that have an issue it could also opt out of playing ND... -- Mr. Touchdown 08/11/2016 10:15AM
I like 9-1 with ND counting as one of the 9 if you play them. ** -- Stech 08/10/2016 6:30PM
Me as well, but can it work with ND playing 5 teams? -- BUGGZY 08/10/2016 9:26PM
All conference games need to count -- LaneRat 08/10/2016 4:16PM
The great thing here is that the fans win either way -- Hokie Bird 08/10/2016 2:27PM
Hand it to the Beamer Era they did not attempt to pad like Dooley did ** -- BigCrumpy 08/10/2016 3:19PM
Dooley did not have the advantage of a conference schedule. As an -- Femoyer Hokie 08/10/2016 4:43PM
Yeah, we played a lot of good teams. Problem was -- reestuart 08/10/2016 8:05PM
I recommend the simple approach -- EDGEMAN 08/10/2016 12:52PM
What about if the Playoff Committee frowns upon conference foes -- VTHokie2000 08/10/2016 1:06PM
Then go with a 9+1 schedule, and elminate the cross-over game! -- EDGEMAN 08/10/2016 5:33PM
As long as the ACC uses the zipper model then I believe the -- VTHokie2000 08/10/2016 5:50PM
The ACC has already suggested the idea of scheduling other division games.. -- EDGEMAN 08/11/2016 10:01AM
Reduced from what? Teams are currently playing their rival 0 times as OOC -- VTHokie2000 08/11/2016 11:49AM
So if the committee "frowns" on scheduling ACC teams OOC, then... -- EDGEMAN 08/12/2016 09:41AM
I am not following your logic. How is the ACC playing a 9-game -- VTHokie2000 08/12/2016 10:50AM
++ for creativity ** -- daveinop 08/09/2016 5:49PM