All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by

Conference Realignment Board

I85Hokie

Joined: 01/14/2012 Posts: 2139
Likes: 1129

What's this?

It's more for practical reasons


With that format you can pretty much have every team's conference schedule set in stone, once you figure out who gets who as far as the five-team rotating schedule goes. It's a lot easier than randomly assigning 8 out of 13 teams to everyone every year.

And even with the three teams assigned to VT (which I assumed is akin to what the ACC would give us rather than what we would prefer), giving up playing UNC and Miami every year would be more than made up by rotating FSU and Clemson every year.

[Post edited by I85Hokie at 01/14/2016 09:47AM]

(In response to this post by Vippie1)

Posted: 01/14/2016 at 09:46AM


+1

Insert a Link

Enter the title of the link here:


Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:


75
Hide This

Current Thread:
 
  ACC should adopt rotating divisions... -- BUGGZY 01/13/2016 10:24PM
  The original set up was to rotate every few years -- BigCrumpy 01/14/2016 2:55PM
  Schools are fine with the divisions. The proposed -- Colonel Jessup 01/14/2016 10:39AM
  I like the idea of 3 permanent rivals, and the other 5 games rotating -- I85Hokie 01/14/2016 09:04AM
  You lost me by keeping BC as one of our "permant" rivals -- EDGEMAN 01/14/2016 1:14PM
  3 permanent rivals is unnecessary -- Vippie1 01/14/2016 09:33AM
  It's more for practical reasons -- I85Hokie 01/14/2016 09:46AM
  Don't make it performance based, just rotate them through evenly. -- chuckd4vt 01/14/2016 03:08AM

Tech Sideline is Presented By:

Our Sponsors








vm307