All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by

The Lounge Board

HokieAl

Joined: 10/07/1999 Posts: 15853
Likes: 4627


That article makes a big assumption that skews the result


The article assumes a test accuracy of 90% for antibody positive results. It also does not differentiate between the inaccurate 10% (is that for a positive that is missed, or for a negative that is incorrectly shown as positive). Those are two very different outcomes and we know for a fact that the antibody tests have a higher accuracy rate in correctly determining if someone is a true negative (usually this negative testing is 99% accurate for the tests I've seen on the market).

So the whole argument about false positives is just not real. The accuracy of the tests being 90-95% is on whether they correctly identify those who are positive. For those who are negative, the tests are 99%+ accurate because they are designed to be sensitive.

(In response to this post by Stork)

Posted: 05/13/2020 at 11:24AM



+1

Insert a Link

Enter the title of the link here:


Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:


Current Thread:
  Simple statistical math -- `lag 05/13/2020 1:03PM
  It sure takes a village.... -- Freddyburg Hokie 05/13/2020 11:11AM
  Let's go through a simple example... -- BB Hokie 05/13/2020 10:27AM
  From the linked study, my interpretation -- HokieForever 05/13/2020 10:19AM
  Quick recap says -- Stork 05/13/2020 10:15AM

Tech Sideline is Presented By:

Our Sponsors

vm307