All Hokie, All the Time. Period.

Conference Realignment Board

VTHokie2000

Joined: 1/1/05 Posts: 11716
Likes: 1905


I wasn't suggesting the payout is per game, but by sport


If the ACC wants to increase the number of lacrosse schools, then what is the incentive for the 10 non-lacrosse schools to add the sport if they are going to receive the same payout regardless whether they sponsor the sport or not? The same would hold true for gymnastics, wrestling, swimming/diving, and any of the other non-revenue sports.

(In response to this post by HOO86)

Posted: 01/16/2018 at 3:56PM



+0

Insert a Link

Enter the title of the link here:


Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:


Current Thread:
 
  
ESPN and Hockey East reach multi-year deal -- HOO86 01/15/2018 4:31PM
  If so, and they are the only ones doing it... -- EDGEMAN 01/16/2018 09:54AM
  It would be interesting to see how much of payout BC -- VTHokie2000 01/16/2018 1:43PM
  The only reason I could see the ACC go with ice hockey -- VTHokie2000 01/16/2018 2:52PM
  I'm not suggesting more revenue for the games. -- HOO86 01/16/2018 3:29PM
  So BC wouldn't get more money because its hockey games -- VTHokie2000 01/16/2018 3:35PM
  No. The payout is aggregate and split by 15. -- HOO86 01/16/2018 3:45PM
  Recruiting Students -- HOO86 01/16/2018 6:18PM
  ND gets no TV money from the Big Ten. -- TerryD 01/16/2018 1:49PM

Support TSL by Shopping at Amazon


Our Sponsors







vm312