Insert a Link
Enter the title of the link here:
Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:
Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:
|
Current Thread:
|
Ww2 peeps: why was the potential of the cv ignored in favor of battleships? -- HokieDan95 10/22/2017 10:08PM
10/23/2017 12:41PM
My dad,a sub engineer, said to put $ in subs vs carriers.... -- TD-Tech 10/23/2017 11:54AM Thought the Japanese I400 was an interesting idea -- HokieDan95 10/23/2017 1:54PM Potential with that - in the little reading I did, the... -- TD-Tech 10/23/2017 2:40PM We had three fleet carriers in the Pacific when the war started. -- hokieman842 10/23/2017 09:39AM Battleships were old hat by the time of WW1 -- I85Hokie 10/23/2017 07:37AM People are resistant to change -- Vienna_Hokie 10/22/2017 10:28PM Battleships still have their place, as will CVNs in the future. -- EDGEMAN 10/23/2017 08:52AM Agree with all that...it's the over-focus and budget driven decisions -- Vienna_Hokie 10/23/2017 09:32AM The US already had battleships. It wasn't like you could build a bunch of -- Hokie`79 10/22/2017 10:25PMTech Sideline is Presented By:
Our Sponsors
