however, they are even better if accompanied by detail and context. Is a drop from 14.3 to 12.5 that significant? Could the analysis be interpreted differently if the information distinguished between conference versus nonconference, injury/foul trouble, mop up versus crunch time, etc.? Clearly guys prefer increased roles and minutes but, I think we would all agree that 12.5 versus 14.3 may not be significant if considered under the old adage it is often not as important who starts a game as who finishes it. I am not saying soflahokie is wrong but, that I buy the being recruited over as likely much more significant than a variation of 14.3 minutes to 12.5 minutes.