You do know that Russia will be entirely "glassed over" if they fire one -- EDGEMAN 03/03/2022 09:23AM
From Russia with Love: 500 nukes could guarantee destruction of US and NATO -- MikeVT85 03/02/2022 6:25PM
Good reflection of Soviet attitude. 500? LOL, peanuts. ** -- ACCWatcher 03/02/2022 10:23PM
Us Cold War babies laugh at you youngsters’ crying paranoia. -- Stork 03/02/2022 9:30PM
I hear stories of young people having anxiety and depression -- Tafkam Hokie 03/03/2022 09:04AM
They are having doom and gloom shoved down their throats -- EDGEMAN 03/03/2022 09:25AM
Well then its the destruction of the world? (well maybe not NZ). We would -- UTPr0sim 03/02/2022 8:13PM
Retorical_? If you destroy the world, what do you have. A Russie launch -- IB4TECH 03/02/2022 7:33PM
Not that it matters, because a dozen nukes from either side would be -- HokieNerd 03/02/2022 7:09PM
A large part of US deterrent is deployed on "Boomers"... -- Burruss Writer 03/03/2022 07:58AM
US and NATO could also destroy Russia -- HokieR 03/02/2022 7:03PM
American Subs with nuclear weapons could launch a missile for almost any -- jdkhokie 03/02/2022 8:43PM
A Seawolf is a "fast attack" sub, not a boomer. ** -- EDGEMAN 03/02/2022 7:21PM
Yep. My bad. ** -- HokieR 03/03/2022 05:09AM
Seawolf however does have ample land strike capabilty -- GOHOKEE 03/02/2022 7:37PM
Unfortunately we only built three of them. ** -- EDGEMAN 03/03/2022 09:29AM
"UnFORTUNatEly" is correct in that they cost too damn much. Not worth it. -- GOHOKEE 03/03/2022 11:32AM
You would think but i also wouldn't be surprised if we aren't prepared -- FlintMS 03/02/2022 7:11PM
That’s so 1956 ** -- VT BronzeBacker 03/02/2022 7:00PM
The scariest part is, who will STOP him if he decides to do it? ** -- HOKIERIT 03/02/2022 7:00PM