OHF linked an article that I believe draws a straight line
between where we were, where we are, and that explains some of the actions by the school and athletic department that have at times defied logic.
He met my burden of proof because I have looked at this situation from many angles and came to the same conclusion.
He clearly has not met your burden of proof for this same argument, which is why we do not agree. We don't have to. I am open to hearing your theory since you do not accept the one I subscribe to, that Sands has no interest in any one sport and has allowed football to falter in order to prop up other sports (which the article states, by the way). Why are we where we are and what explains the boneheaded leadership we have seen with regard to the football program in the last however many years?
|
(
In response to this post by 2hhoop3)
Posted: 03/29/2021 at 5:57PM