Guarantee UVA wants a good football program, really, really bad.

Would say they probably want it more than having a good BB program. But they wouldn't degrade their BB program to get it, nor would we degrade our football program for basketball success. We all want both.

But when it comes to expansion, do you stick with the "BB first" approach, or the "all sport" approach. I wager "the Virginias" are in the "all sport" group. The NC Mafia prefer the "BB first" approach, although would hope NCSU breaks with their political group.

In response to this post by VTHokie2000

Posted: 12/19/2018 at 6:16PM

Who are the "political voting groups" within the ACC? -- EDGEMAN 12/19/2018 10:21AM

I'm not sure where you really put GT and Louisville -- Late 80s Hokie 12/27/2018 1:44PM

I agree, but there are also some cross-ways ties, such as UVA to UNC. ** -- techman 12/21/2018 8:22PM

Pretty good job but I'd have a special category -- Vippie1 12/20/2018 12:09PM

My list is shorter... -- M-I-C 12/19/2018 5:27PM

Actually u see vt and uva as brokers -- Mercury 12/19/2018 11:23AM

I think that's where a Venn diagram would come in handy. -- EDGEMAN 12/19/2018 1:11PM

If we are talking strictly football issues, then isn't the Virginia group -- VTHokie2000 12/19/2018 5:20PM

VT has become a directors cup school. -- SoCloseHokie 12/21/2018 03:16AM

I was thinking more in terms of the 2 revenue sports -- VTHokie2000 12/21/2018 10:43AM

I agree with most of your thoughts. I would add that basketball is high -- hokie4ever 12/21/2018 10:17AM

Not if you want anyone watching your sports in 30 years ** -- VictoryTurkey 12/23/2018 3:51PM

This is the VISION of the UNIIVERSITY a diverse offering of national cgms -- Mercury 12/21/2018 07:13AM

Football pays bills. Lacrosse cost bills. ** -- SoCloseHokie 12/21/2018 07:30AM

Guarantee UVA wants a good football program, really, really bad. -- EDGEMAN 12/19/2018 6:16PM

Guarantee UVA wants a good football program, really, really bad.

Insert a Link

Tech Sideline is Presented By:

Our Sponsors