I agree with most of your thoughts. I would add that basketball is high

high profile and can/will generate revenue. Having Olympic sports is nice and good for students and the university to be well rounded, but the overriding focus should be football first, basketball second, and then everything else. Football has to be the engine that pulls the train.

In response to this post by SoCloseHokie

Posted: 12/21/2018 at 10:17AM

Who are the "political voting groups" within the ACC? -- EDGEMAN 12/19/2018 10:21AM

I'm not sure where you really put GT and Louisville -- Late 80s Hokie 12/27/2018 1:44PM

I agree, but there are also some cross-ways ties, such as UVA to UNC. ** -- techman 12/21/2018 8:22PM

Pretty good job but I'd have a special category -- Vippie1 12/20/2018 12:09PM

My list is shorter... -- M-I-C 12/19/2018 5:27PM

Actually u see vt and uva as brokers -- Mercury 12/19/2018 11:23AM

I think that's where a Venn diagram would come in handy. -- EDGEMAN 12/19/2018 1:11PM

If we are talking strictly football issues, then isn't the Virginia group -- VTHokie2000 12/19/2018 5:20PM

VT has become a directors cup school. -- SoCloseHokie 12/21/2018 03:16AM

I was thinking more in terms of the 2 revenue sports -- VTHokie2000 12/21/2018 10:43AM

I agree with most of your thoughts. I would add that basketball is high -- hokie4ever 12/21/2018 10:17AM

Not if you want anyone watching your sports in 30 years ** -- VictoryTurkey 12/23/2018 3:51PM

This is the VISION of the UNIIVERSITY a diverse offering of national cgms -- Mercury 12/21/2018 07:13AM

Football pays bills. Lacrosse cost bills. ** -- SoCloseHokie 12/21/2018 07:30AM

Guarantee UVA wants a good football program, really, really bad. -- EDGEMAN 12/19/2018 6:16PM

I agree with most of your thoughts. I would add that basketball is high

Insert a Link

Tech Sideline is Presented By:

Our Sponsors