All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by

Conference Realignment Board

Mizzoufan

Joined: 02/24/2016 Posts: 14
Likes: 18


Re: Question about your point on potential pods


That was just an example. My only speculation on future realingment are these:

1) Texas ends up in either the SEC or the ACC. This is because of the LHN. Being owned by ESPN and going several years past the Big 12 media contracts; I suspect that ESPN will make UT go to either SEC or ACC with SEC being more likely.

2) Conferences will be limited to 16 teams. This is because it is far better to have 4 team pods than 5. 5 team pods will result in a 9 game conference schedule. A 4 team pod can result in a 7 game conference schedule with the possibility of an eighth rival game.

3) I expect the conferences to have finals and a championship game leading up to the 3 games for the national title. Thus, to make the playoffs you only need to beat out your 3 pod mates. Makes for a good sell to the universities and then make money on all of the playoff game. If you want to keep the bowl games going; how about the second place teams playing in "futures" game with red shirt players and excluding those who have finished their eligibility at the end of the regular season. You will need these games to provide the financial incentives for the realignment to occur.

(In response to this post by VTHokie2000)

Posted: 05/15/2017 at 5:17PM



+0

Insert a Link

Enter the title of the link here:


Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:


Current Thread:
  Question about your point on potential pods -- VTHokie2000 05/15/2017 4:58PM
  Re: Question about your point on potential pods -- Mizzoufan 05/15/2017 5:17PM
  Good post. -- Old Line Hokie 05/15/2017 1:52PM
  Two things -- EDGEMAN 05/15/2017 08:59AM
  I read recently that Mizzou -- mancunian 05/15/2017 08:54AM

Tech Sideline is Presented By:

Our Sponsors

vm307