We've already seen the NET is a flawed model

It may be good to determine efficiency, but not a team's overall ability to beat down opponents.

If it was a good model, we would have had very few upsets.

(In response to this post by BigDave)

Posted: 03/18/2022 at 09:50AM

PREV NEXT REPLY

Insert a Link

Enter the title of the link here:

Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:

Current Thread:

I don't know if the Big 10+4 is overrated, but the Mountain West sure is -- BigDave 03/18/2022 07:14AM

I thought the ACC got screwed, but the Pac-12 only got 3 teams? Just wow! ** -- EDGEMAN 03/18/2022 09:12AM

The PAC 12 only had 3 teams with NET rankings in the top 60 -- BigDave 03/18/2022 09:36AM

We've already seen the NET is a flawed model -- EDGEMAN 03/18/2022 09:50AM

There were only 4 upsets, based on point spread. ** -- reestuart 03/18/2022 11:24AM

Good luck finding a predictive model that leads to -- Pylons 03/18/2022 10:49AM

We've already seen the NET is a flawed model

Insert a Link

Tech Sideline is Presented By:

Our Sponsors