+1000, he is feeding the troll and providing more drama in a process that
is made to create drama. If they put in a fair objective system, then the bubble debate (and post debate) would go away. Less eyeballs, less clicks, less money, less politics, etc.
Someone mentioned this last week, but a system that uses a ranking such as NET to qualify whether a win is good or not, should just use NET to rank the teams. If the NET ranking isn't good enough to rank the teams, than how can it be used to provide a metric to rank wins?
The process is certifiably insane!....by nature.
|
(
In response to this post by bigbadbird)
Posted: 03/16/2022 at 10:20AM