I would argue that what actually determines in or out, changes by the year

To fulfill arguments of top brass to get their favorite teams in the tournament.

Smoke and mirrors and lists of rankings and various rating systems help to create a fog of War, while those in control do what they want.

I would argue that VT's problem is that we don't have enough friends in "high places".

In response to this post by Chris Coleman

Posted: 03/11/2022 at 12:02PM

How is ND comfortably in, but VT is still on the bubble? -- Gobbler Guru 03/11/2022 11:51AM

If the human equation was removed and the system relied on 12 computer -- anotherdamnyankeehokie 03/11/2022 12:34PM

How is Meechigan comfortably in with a 17-14 record, and #34 NET -- EDGEMAN 03/11/2022 12:09PM

5 Q1 wins, and with 20 conference games, W/L records matter less now ** -- BROman Hokie 03/11/2022 12:14PM

Sorry, but I don't buy these "quad" rankings -- EDGEMAN 03/11/2022 12:17PM

The NET is the only reason we have a shot at dancing... -- BROman Hokie 03/11/2022 12:20PM

It underscores the importance of using multiple metrics… -- lawhokie 03/11/2022 12:08PM

I think you touched on a lot of things.. but better wins, better overall -- 6thStreetHokie 03/11/2022 11:55AM

Their overall strength of record is No. 36. -- Chris Coleman

03/11/2022 11:53AM

No team lower than 52 in average SOR + KPI has ever made the tournament -- soflahokie 03/11/2022 12:05PM

What about after tonight? ** -- PennaHokie 03/11/2022 12:33PM

I would argue that what actually determines in or out, changes by the year -- jonnyhawk 03/11/2022 12:02PM

Nah, no way. -- Chris Coleman

03/11/2022 12:04PM

Michigan is the one I don’t get- only 3 games above 500 and lost to -- sacramento hokie 03/11/2022 1:08PM

You are not making the conspiracy theorists happy. ** -- hokietony 03/11/2022 12:16PM

I would argue that what actually determines in or out, changes by the year

Insert a Link

Tech Sideline is Presented By:

Our Sponsors