I have zero info on this, but I get the feeling that Radford stays....

If so, it seems MY must be comfortable with (or is resigned to) his backcourt being undesized and try to make up for it with experience. That puts this team in a good but not great situation.

In response to this post by VT ChemE 1986

Posted: 07/20/2021 at 7:56PM

The discussion below about Radford misses one point I think -- VT ChemE 1986 07/20/2021 10:39AM

I would agree... -- GCHokie34 07/20/2021 3:24PM

Cone is not a wing ** -- NMB Hokie 07/21/2021 7:52PM

Cone was a wing for VT 100% of his minutes ** -- GCHokie34 07/21/2021 7:56PM

Do you think MY could have done anything different to keep.. -- BeachGobbler 07/21/2021 1:17PM

What Downfall -- Jomonelson 07/21/2021 10:29AM

Could Mutts spend some time at the 3 to help? ** -- Bmackattack 07/20/2021 5:05PM

No... -- GCHokie34 07/20/2021 6:13PM

I could definitely see mutts playing some wing -- VTHokienation 07/20/2021 6:02PM

The coaches have to have a plan, right? -- VT ChemE 1986 07/20/2021 3:40PM

I have zero info on this, but I get the feeling that Radford stays.... -- vtbball80 07/20/2021 7:56PM

Hope you are correct and we aren’t looking at a plan that -- Femoyer Hokie 07/20/2021 4:51PM

Mutts can play the 3 at the same level, Radford played PG half the time -- soflahokie 07/20/2021 10:55AM

Sorry, didn't see your Mutts comment until after my post above... ** -- Bmackattack 07/20/2021 5:06PM

Lol same with me ** -- VTHokienation 07/20/2021 6:03PM

I have zero info on this, but I get the feeling that Radford stays....

Insert a Link

Tech Sideline is Presented By:

Our Sponsors