All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by

The Lounge Board

`lag

Joined: 12/13/1999 Posts: 62574
Likes: 14988


Yeah basically profit and risk


You go blockbuster, you make a lot of money or you can lose a lot of money. So they tend to go safer, more formulistic, if something works, why not go back to it? same with paying stars to bring in audiences. Especially if the costs of doing the movie are going up you have less room for failure. eg, with all the special effects which are basically what movies are today. But, of course, you end up with less interesting/retread plots. And this is not a very original point on my part, these dynamics have been discussed in the media.

I'm thinking "No Time to Die" should be the last James Bond movie that is, what new twist can you give it? But there's no way they're not going to make one until it loses money.


[Post edited by `lag at 07/02/2021 11:25AM]

(In response to this post by hoosnowahokie)

Posted: 07/02/2021 at 11:13AM



+1

Insert a Link

Enter the title of the link here:


Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:


Current Thread:
  Godfather I & II showed $$$ to be made ** -- WestyHokie 07/02/2021 1:37PM
  The force is strong in this one. ** -- BusLoadaBozos 07/02/2021 11:41AM
  They haven’t gotten worse by any means. -- vthokieq 07/02/2021 6:02PM
  The next one has the best title though... -- Vienna_Hokie 07/02/2021 1:58PM
  They ran out of new ideas? ** -- Tuckahokie 07/02/2021 11:35AM
  What post? ** -- TexasGobbler 07/02/2021 2:17PM
  Creativity ** -- Stork 07/02/2021 11:29AM
  Rick aversion. ** -- HokieNoVA 07/02/2021 11:17AM
  Have you met Rick? He's a total ass. ** -- HokieNoVA 07/02/2021 2:22PM
  ...and lazyness. ** -- EDGEMAN 07/02/2021 11:18AM
  No sh**? ** -- HokieDan95 07/02/2021 11:13AM
  Someone made a sequel, made a ton of money -- hoosnowahokie 07/02/2021 10:56AM

Tech Sideline is Presented By:

Our Sponsors

vm307