If someone is worried about $300 a month when they're 95 compared to what
you could be doing with that $700 a month between the ages of 62 and 67, okay, I guess you're right for your situation. I'd rather have the larger amount when I'm still young enough to enjoy it. I would also say if you factored in not touching your other money for those 5 years, your growth could easily make up for that $300 or whatever that amount ends up being.
Plus, as many have stated, SS is not going to be in good shape in the next 13 years. I wouldn't put too much trust it will still be here in 2040, or be there at the same rates of return.
|
(
In response to this post by statmanfromHCyrs)
Posted: 03/18/2021 at 11:00AM