I prefer to keep Wake over BC. I don't think anyone will ever get -- Lakeridgehokie 05/09/2016 2:05PM
I wish we left this wake topic alone. -- ahokie4u 05/09/2016 2:04PM
Contraction is a reasonable possibility in the future. ** -- chuckd4vt 05/09/2016 4:03PM
No one sad it wasn't however -- ahokie4u 05/09/2016 7:18PM
Wake is staying in the ACC. ** -- Stech 05/09/2016 12:49PM
All sports member? ** -- Femoyer Hokie 05/09/2016 1:13PM
Yes ** -- Stech 05/09/2016 9:32PM
Then that's that! Any guess on a network announcement timeline? -- daveinop 05/10/2016 08:15AM
Kicking out Wake would not set a precidence -- BigCrumpy 05/09/2016 11:58AM
Wake offers nothing to the ACC save that they are already grandfathered in -- BigCrumpy 05/09/2016 11:54AM
Wake isn't going anywhere. My concerns about .... -- Old Line Hokie 05/09/2016 10:53AM
Sorry I hit the wrong Key They offer nothing -- BigCrumpy 05/09/2016 11:56AM
Glass Houses... -- Mongotek 05/09/2016 10:17AM
My thougts exactly! ** -- VT ChemE 1986 05/09/2016 12:20PM
Answer: Temple and the Big East -- BigCrumpy 05/09/2016 11:58AM
Part of the issue is a lack of support by Wake's alumni... -- lawhokie 05/09/2016 10:45AM
Wake Forest is enlarging their Athletics Endowment like Stanford does. -- HOO86 05/09/2016 12:22PM
Stanford is an inappropriate comparison to any ACC school. -- crabcake77 05/09/2016 6:18PM
What alumni? -- BigCrumpy 05/09/2016 12:00PM
I thought the same thing - never met anyone who went to WF. ** -- HokieMJL 05/09/2016 4:14PM
Further, if they don't care about football, why keep the program? ** -- crabcake77 05/09/2016 11:05AM
Agree ** -- BigCrumpy 05/09/2016 12:03PM
The Wake situation is one reason I'd favor the B1G for Virginia Tech -- lawhokie 05/09/2016 10:47AM
Replace B1G with SEC and you're spot on! ** -- hardcorpshokie 05/09/2016 11:21AM
Hmm who would I rather play -- BigCrumpy 05/09/2016 12:02PM
You're being serious right? -- hardcorpshokie 05/09/2016 1:09PM
Enjoyment of away games is not a critical factor imo -- lawhokie 05/09/2016 1:42PM
You think we send a small amount now -- RTFC 05/10/2016 10:11AM
Playing schools that give a darn about football is. ** -- hardcorpshokie 05/09/2016 2:16PM
Yeah, nobody in the Big Ten cares about football. How about bball? -- reestuart 05/09/2016 2:20PM
Football is the name of the game in conference expansion though! ** -- hardcorpshokie 05/09/2016 3:12PM
I just don't think seeing a sundress in Georgia every two years -- reestuart 05/09/2016 4:23PM
Its not, but its enough to dismiss advocating the merits of playing -- hardcorpshokie 05/09/2016 6:53PM
To SHUN or not to SHUN that is the question......... ** -- VTHokie2000 05/09/2016 4:53PM
We'd be Big Ten East, so we'd never play those teams. -- reestuart 05/09/2016 12:08PM
If the Big Ten expands east, then mostly likely Indiana would -- VTHokie2000 05/09/2016 12:25PM
I would think so as well. ** -- reestuart 05/09/2016 12:36PM
I could see Wake potentially packing it up -- I85Hokie 05/09/2016 08:44AM
I could see some schools tapping out once players are truly paid. -- chuckd4vt 05/09/2016 4:06PM
There's no way WF bolts, too much $$$ on the line ** -- BROman Hokie 05/09/2016 08:49AM
Wake would have to give up over 15 sports to make it viable -- BigCrumpy 05/09/2016 12:04PM
I agree. Money + exposure. Not sure they have a reason to leave ** -- corvt2000 05/09/2016 09:16AM
Currently, there are only two ways to bring additional money to the ACC -- manassashoo 05/09/2016 08:17AM
Or (3) receive an at-large bid to the Big 6 bowls... -- Freddyburg Hokie 05/09/2016 1:44PM
Bingo, as of right now Wake is worthless to any BSC conference. -- BigCrumpy 05/09/2016 12:06PM
Neither does VT according to your analysis. People should leave Wake alone ** -- Lakeridgehokie 05/09/2016 09:13AM
I'm thinking that's the conclusion manassashoo wanted you to draw. ** -- Will Stewart
05/09/2016 11:51AM
LOL! You think? ** -- 8792HOKIE 05/09/2016 5:36PM
Re: Currently, there are only two ways to bring additional money to the ACC -- SoCloseHokie 05/09/2016 08:48AM