$250 million per year for half? -- crabcake77 04/19/2016 11:00PM Delete post** -- crabcake77 04/19/2016 10:59PMInsert a Link
Enter the title of the link here:
Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:
Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:
|
Current Thread:
|
$250 million per year for half? -- crabcake77 04/19/2016 11:00PM Delete post** -- crabcake77 04/19/2016 10:59PM You have it wrong -- nebraskafaninwi 04/19/2016 5:41PM "1/3 of the US?" By what metric? ** -- crabcake77 04/19/2016 10:45PM No pressure on ESPN at all. They don't need the Big Ten. -- HOO86 04/19/2016 7:11PM Losing major metro areas is a big deal -- nebraskafaninwi 04/19/2016 7:34PM Frankly ESPN got ny city and dc as well -- Mercury 04/19/2016 8:59PM To be clear, this was a GOOD day for the B1G. It may also -- daveinop 04/19/2016 8:14PM I'm actually pleased. But exactly what markets did they lose? ** -- daveinop 04/19/2016 7:59PM What metro area did they lose with NFL,NBA and MLB? -- HOO86 04/19/2016 7:38PM You don't know what you are talking about -- nebraskafaninwi 04/19/2016 7:56PM ESPN loses no markets. They are in them all. -- HOO86 04/19/2016 8:17PM Re: ESPN loses no markets. They are in them all. -- 33laszlo99 04/20/2016 12:47AM They could sublicense a hand full of games from other networks. -- HOO86 04/20/2016 08:52AM This is the beginning of the market correction...networks are overpaying ** -- VictoryTurkey 04/20/2016 07:00AM They would lose CFB markets...major deal -- nebraskafaninwi 04/19/2016 8:27PM This statement isn't even close to correct -- daveinop 04/20/2016 08:42AM They'll survive without Ohio and Michigan. -- HOO86 04/19/2016 8:40PM Exactly. What markets are they losing? -- crabcake77 04/19/2016 11:18PM All ESPN would lose are people watching Michigan and Ohio State games. -- HOO86 04/20/2016 12:14AM Yep! Nailed it ** -- FlyFishingHokie 04/19/2016 8:04PM The Big Ten will likely bring in 43-48 million (Not including bowls ect) -- goldendomer 04/19/2016 6:12PM Not sure how you get there with 18 million per school for its best half. -- HOO86 04/19/2016 7:06PM Per the article, $250 is the max. Interesting part is ESPN did not -- daveinop 04/19/2016 7:20PM With SEC football and ACC basketball and Texas, no reason to overbid. -- HOO86 04/19/2016 7:28PM Their tighter budget is forcing more strategic thinking. No accident they -- daveinop 04/19/2016 7:33PM That's my impression. And B1G made it short (6 years). -- HOO86 04/19/2016 7:41PM I think folks are also trying to figure out where cord-cutting is going. -- daveinop 04/19/2016 7:45PM Sure they are. I know a commissioner studying the hell out of it. ** -- HOO86 04/19/2016 7:49PM Our fearless leader! ** -- FlyFishingHokie 04/19/2016 8:14PM Yep. He should have a PhD in the subject by now. ** -- HOO86 04/19/2016 9:02PM You really believe in the guy at this point? Seriously? -- chuckd4vt 04/20/2016 03:18AM Nope. I fired him after Raycom-Gate. But -- daveinop 04/20/2016 08:52AM No way, it still has lot of good content and BTN pay-out not included -- goldendomer 04/19/2016 7:17PM The second half will be paid less than the first half. You watch. ** -- HOO86 04/19/2016 7:30PM We will see... It will at minimum be around 43 mil IMO. This is Delaney's -- goldendomer 04/19/2016 7:32PM I think he promised Maryland that. Don't expect to see him deliver. ** -- HOO86 04/19/2016 7:35PM I'm being conservative... ** -- goldendomer 04/19/2016 7:37PM Whatever good content you have, making it play Rutgers 9 times ain't good. -- HOO86 04/19/2016 7:45PM Oh, no doubt, but I think more like 1.5X rather than 2X ** -- daveinop 04/19/2016 7:28PM Quote -- goldendomer 04/19/2016 7:27PMTech Sideline is Presented By:
Our Sponsors
