Seem to be using their older tanks, infantry supplies is my understanding.** -- MikeVT85 03/22/2022 4:14PMInsert a Link
Enter the title of the link here:
Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:
Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:
|
Current Thread:
|
Seem to be using their older tanks, infantry supplies is my understanding.** -- MikeVT85 03/22/2022 4:14PM Since everyone on Twitter is now an expert in Electronic Warfare systems -- Fatman 03/22/2022 2:28PM Didn't we have between 200-300k to invade Iraq? 150k to take on Ukranians. -- Hokebury 03/22/2022 1:20PM Perhaps - but Russia will just take every citizen above 18 and throw ... -- OXVT 03/22/2022 1:02PM Russia has horrible demographic challenges. They've had low birth rates -- Fatman 03/22/2022 1:50PM I mean, if that's the case they wouldn't necessarily obey.. -- KfgsHokie 03/22/2022 1:39PM Still no real word on Ukraine losses. Much propaganda on both sides. ** -- Concord Dan 03/22/2022 12:24PM This isn't sustainable. ** -- capitals1 03/22/2022 12:10PM 10% of what they sent, not 10% of what they have ** -- JoesterVT 03/22/2022 12:04PM Yep. Because of course they still have troops throughout -- VAHokie89 03/22/2022 12:50PM Any reports on what % of total Russian forces are in Ukraine?** -- Tank 03/22/2022 12:22PM I have been trying to track the armored vehicles specifically. One of the -- reconhokie 03/22/2022 12:33PM Found a WP article stating that US officials think it's around 75%. -- Tank 03/22/2022 12:32PM Correct....that would be like 15-20K, correct? Staggering. -- KfgsHokie 03/22/2022 12:07PM 10% of combat force which is in line with 10k mentioned elsewhere. ** -- Concord Dan 03/22/2022 12:22PMTech Sideline is Presented By:
Our Sponsors
