No way he should be the #3 over Miller who was 3-2 in the ACC and 16-6 overall. Miller did lose to Slinger head to head, but Slinger was 1-4 in the ACC and 11-13 overall. The seeding makes zero sense. He is also ahead of Neisenbaum of Duke who was 2-3 in the ACC (including a head to head win over Slinger), and 16-9 overall. Another example of inconsistent criteria being used for seeding...It is evident that the seeding committee did not follow any specific formula and pulled a few of these out of their rear ends...