We will agree to disagree

This is not about hindsight - it was foolish to the point of being ridiculous to go for two in that situation. Just incredibly poor logic or just an inability to conceptualize cost / benefit scenarios by the coaches.

(In response to this post by JoWood07)

Posted: 10/10/2021 at 9:25PM

PREV NEXT REPLY

Insert a Link

Enter the title of the link here:

Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:

Current Thread:

.link...............roanoke times story, fu defends decisions: -- squarerootofone 10/10/2021 7:37PM

There is no sheet that says to go for 2 with -- GUS 10/10/2021 7:53PM

There is a sheet -- JoWood07 10/10/2021 8:20PM

What you would have gained is the ability to be up 2 scores -- Planner_Hokie 10/10/2021 8:51PM

I agree odds were low -- JoWood07 10/10/2021 9:07PM

We will agree to disagree -- Planner_Hokie 10/10/2021 9:25PM

…if it’s on “the sheet”, it’s fair game -- chumley 10/10/2021 8:16PM

We will agree to disagree

Insert a Link

Tech Sideline is Presented By:

Our Sponsors