All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by

Virginia Tech Football Board

Joined: 05/16/2003 Posts: 5153
Likes: 3411

5000+ Posts

Board Member 20+ Years

2000 Likes

1000 Likes

250 Likes

100 Likes

What's this?

What the ruling implied is that they were already compensated …

The ruling said that the NCAA violated antitrust laws by constraining their compensation.

Therefore, since they have been compensated, they should have been paying taxes on scholarships and other incidental expenses that they receive such as food and housing allowances.

And oh, I guess Bruce Smith owes back taxes on that cord of wood. 🥺
[Post edited by VPI63 at 06/21/2021 4:31PM]

(In response to this post by Maroon Baboon)

Posted: 06/21/2021 at 4:04PM

+4

PREV NEXT REPLY

Insert a Link

Enter the title of the link here:

Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:

Current Thread:

Well, since the supreme court has just.. -- VPI63 06/21/2021 3:45PM

I'd rather pay a 50% tax rate on 500k than 0% on nothing. -- Maroon Baboon 06/21/2021 3:54PM

That’s not entirely how it will work -- marcbvtgm 06/21/2021 6:32PM

What the ruling implied is that they were already compensated … -- VPI63 06/21/2021 4:04PM

Yeah, we're gonna need Bruce to pay his buck fifty in tax for that firewood ** -- Zanderhokie 06/22/2021 09:32AM

If that's the ruling, then their scholarships are taxable. ** -- EDGEMAN 06/21/2021 5:50PM

That’s the way I interpret it… -- VPI63 06/21/2021 6:06PM

If scholarships are taxable, then the non-revenue athletes are.... -- EDGEMAN 06/21/2021 5:51PM

Saying it again and again -- VTCALS72 06/22/2021 11:28AM

Even now, I thought tuition was taxable but everything else was. (Room -- public knowledge 06/21/2021 8:52PM

F around and find out...the golden goose has been slain -- VictoryTurkey 06/21/2021 7:27PM