The “research” was a ridiculously tiny study group,

it was unpublished at the time you posted it so it was obviously preprint released to conform to a narrative it wanted to “prove”.
[Post edited by PhotoHokieNC at 08/11/2020 06:46AM]

In response to this post by LonghornHokie

Posted: 08/11/2020 at 06:42AM

Distance-deniers and mask-refusers tend to exhibit psychopathic traits... -- LonghornHokie 08/11/2020 02:24AM

Peer reviewed by a team of Karens? ** -- B777Fr8Dog 08/11/2020 11:13AM

They're coming to take me away, ha-haahh ** -- Riverguy 08/11/2020 09:57AM

The buzz words just keep getting stupider. ** -- HokieNoVA 08/11/2020 09:26AM

Get off my Lawn! ** -- UTPr0sim 08/11/2020 08:00AM

Grate science. ** -- PhotoHokieNC 08/11/2020 05:41AM

More your scientific style? -- LonghornHokie 08/11/2020 06:18AM

The “research” was a ridiculously tiny study group, -- PhotoHokieNC 08/11/2020 06:42AM

Plus it's kind of a circular argument people who don't care... -- `lag 08/11/2020 09:28AM

Explains a lot ** -- Brown Water 08/11/2020 05:11AM

I got a lot of problems with you people! ** -- Stork 08/11/2020 04:15AM

The “research” was a ridiculously tiny study group,

Insert a Link

Tech Sideline is Presented By:

Our Sponsors