The Lounge Board

Joined: 01/10/2012 Posts: 2557
Likes: 1412

What's this?

Here's one. If they play half the season, why should they be paid for 67%

of their salary? I believe it was a 33% cut they agreed to earlier. So they should make money for time not performed?

Also, even if the teams are work $1B, that is only worth that when the team is sold. They are losing revenue not having fans in the stands. To argue the money angle the way Bauer and Snell are is bad. They argue against them losing money while a decent portion of their fans are out of work. Snell tried to compare it to normal everyday people and it is completely off base.

Players would have been better off arguing the safety angle than the money one.

(In response to this post by Tafkam Hokie)

Posted: 05/15/2020 at 2:13PM

PREV NEXT REPLY

Insert a Link

Enter the title of the link here:

Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:

Current Thread:

Trevor Bauer on why MLB players won't negotiate a second salary cut. -- J-Dub 05/15/2020 10:23AM

Chris Davis agrees. ** -- Hockey Dad 05/15/2020 4:29PM

He has a point... -- Beerman 05/15/2020 3:29PM

Almost the same idea as US Women's Soccer argument. -- HWA 05/15/2020 11:16AM

You have two options right as an athlete, actor, etc. -- HokieForever 05/15/2020 11:29AM

Don't have much sympathy for millionaires arguing with billionaires. ** -- Hokie360 05/15/2020 10:57AM

Yeah, it's just not my world ** -- `lag 05/15/2020 11:11AM

You drawing unemployment from the curling club? ** -- PhotoHokieNC 05/15/2020 11:20AM

Curling season is winter. Now it's the NHATBATWL season. -- Hokie360 05/15/2020 11:30AM

Lol, it sure is, twice a week. ** -- `lag 05/15/2020 11:35AM

I have more sympathy for millionaires with a short earning window than the -- NokieHokie 05/15/2020 11:05AM

Players should get 90% of revenues -- armyhokie88 05/15/2020 11:56AM

Yea, paying for capital assets, utilities, insurance, supplies -- fordham 05/15/2020 3:29PM

Oooooof. At 90% of Revenue, every team/owner would lose money. -- HWA 05/15/2020 2:03PM

And it's more so for the guys that are earning less than $1M -- hoosnowahokie 05/15/2020 11:14AM

What about the folks that have to work their whole lives (or at least 65) ** -- Hokie360 05/15/2020 11:13AM

What about them? They're irrelevant to this argument... ** -- NokieHokie 05/15/2020 11:19AM

Not entirely, hourly employees from many teams are getting cut too** -- kingofcassell 05/15/2020 11:26AM

Ahh gotcha. I thought you meant fans. Billionaires you should take care of -- NokieHokie 05/15/2020 11:39AM

The nationals, and most teams, are paying pt employees til the end of may. -- kingofcassell 05/15/2020 11:44AM

What's the difference between a millionaire and a billionaire? -- VTSnake 05/15/2020 11:01AM

I see the same fallacy in his argument I almost always see when discussing -- Tafkam Hokie 05/15/2020 10:49AM

Here's one. If they play half the season, why should they be paid for 67% -- GreencastleHokie 05/15/2020 2:13PM

Why would a team need $200m in cash for 2020? Closer to about 10% of that. -- J-Dub 05/15/2020 1:13PM

Google Fu told me average payroll for an MLB team was $200M/year -- Tafkam Hokie 05/15/2020 1:18PM

3 above $200m. 10 below $101m.** -- J-Dub 05/15/2020 2:12PM

Yeah, as a 33yo, my net worth is VASTLY different than the MIB -- hoosnowahokie 05/15/2020 11:30AM

Sure, but with those assets, you can easily get a very low interest loan -- VTSnake 05/15/2020 11:22AM

That’s why I always get a kick out of those that -- GreenvilleVT 05/15/2020 11:13AM

This needs a lot more likes ** -- HokieForever 05/15/2020 10:59AM

Yep ** -- EDGEMAN 05/15/2020 11:00AM

Yep. Money in the bank is way different. ** -- Chris Coleman

05/15/2020 10:56AM

The risk the players run is alienating their fanbase... -- MP4VT2004 05/15/2020 10:31AM

Right but all of that would hurt the owners, too. -- Gobbler-100 05/15/2020 12:24PM

Right, but fans pay to watch the players. They pull for the players... -- MP4VT2004 05/15/2020 12:31PM

Here's one. If they play half the season, why should they be paid for 67%

Insert a Link

Tech Sideline is Presented By:

Our Sponsors