All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by

Conference Realignment Board

TerryD

Joined: 10/27/2015 Posts: 1328
Likes: 551


It is actually a very limited ruling.


It is nothing Earth shattering and is much less than the plaintiffs were seeking and some others were hoping.


"Among the items U.S. District Judge Claudia Wilken said these athletes may receive are scholarships to complete undergraduate or graduate degrees at any school. The judge also appeared to open the possibility of athletes being able to receive cash or cash-equivalent awards based on academics or graduation, albeit under some constraints.

At the same time, however, her 104-page ruling prevents athletes from receiving unlimited benefits, as the plaintiffs had hoped.

The NCAA "may continue ... to limit compensation and benefits that are unrelated to education," Wilken ruled.

She also said that the association may adopt a definition of compensation and benefits that are “related to education.”

The association can limit "academic or graduation awards of incentives, provided in cash or cash-equivalent" but that limit cannot be "less than the maximum amount of compensation that an individual could receive in an academic school year in participation, championship, or other special achievement awards (combined)."


It seems to mean/will cause much less than the all encompassing changes the plaintiffs wanted and some predicted.
[Post edited by TerryD at 03/09/2019 09:00AM]

(In response to this post by goldendomer)

Posted: 03/09/2019 at 09:00AM



+0

Insert a Link

Enter the title of the link here:


Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:


Current Thread:
 
  
NCAA lost the Alston case -- goldendomer 03/08/2019 10:09PM
  It is actually a very limited ruling. -- TerryD 03/09/2019 09:00AM

Tech Sideline is Presented By:

Our Sponsors

vm307