If it's a basis of comparison, shouldn't we evaluate vs more teams with the
same standard?
Of course, I admit don't have any idea how much arse-pain that is for you. But I'd like to see how your methodology sees other than the top ACC teams over those 2-3 years using the same criteria. That way you could determine if it's biased, or more objectively rigorous.
|
(
In response to this post by Chris Coleman)
Posted: 02/09/2018 at 11:42AM