Their resume is similar to ours (prior to our recent skid) --- HORRENDOUS non-conference schedule, then some top-notch wins in ACC.

Four of their non-conf wins are vs 328, 331, 333, and 344 RPI. They also lost to UMass (189) and Minnesota (240).

Clemson 19-11 (12-6 ACC) should get the job done --- how can the committee ignore 12 ACC wins?

But I'm not sure about 18-12 (11-5 ACC). With 18 wins, they'd probably need +1 win in ACC Tourney. Keep in mind, Clemson still has two games against Boston College (199 RPI) --- beating BC twice won't exactly move the needle.