Re: so we are going to go from usually having classes land in the 20-40's
I don't think I said we need top 10 classes, b/c I agree I don't think that's realistic given the geography and lack of "bagmen". But we have decent history, and decent facilities, and we're in a P5 conference. I think we ought to have a goal to be in that second tier - in the teens somewhere, at least in the top 25. Last year was hopefully an anomaly - yes it was a small class, but it also lacked star power.
At least if we're in the teens we have a puncher's chance of landing a game-changer (ala MV1) who could, in any given year, boost us up into that top tier on the field.
|
(
In response to this post by fordham)
Posted: 02/07/2020 at 6:02PM