The only viable argument for more bowls is that it is a reward for players.

Players usually play hard even if they lose (Mia & FSU notwithstanding)
and one could argue they deserve a bowl trip even for mediocrity.

My beef is that it's usually a recipe for a poor matchup and average play.

I would be OK for teams .500 and lower to have a conference paid trip to spend a week in warm weather without subjecting fans, who pay alot of money to see two average teams play in an anonymous bowl game.

Bottom line is if bowls stop making $ they will cease to exist.

GO HOKIES!
[Post edited by pajokie at 12/27/2018 2:26PM]

(In response to this post by 3TechFanz)

Posted: 12/27/2018 at 2:26PM

Insert a Link

Enter the title of the link here:

Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:

Current Thread:

The only viable argument for more bowls is that it is a reward for players.

Insert a Link

Tech Sideline is Presented By:

Our Sponsors