All Hokie, All the Time. Period.

Virginia Tech Olympic Sports

Pylons

Joined: 8/25/05 Posts: 12281
Likes: 1602


I think you're selling the advantage short


it's not an advantage in "headcount" sports, which based on one page I found are:

Football (DI FBS only), Basketball (DI men’s and women’s), Tennis (DI women only), Gymnastics (DI women only) and Volleyball (DI women only).

In those sports, an athlete "counts" if they get any scholarship money, from $1 up to full COA...so you don't see partial scholarships and you can't give an academic scholarship to "save" an athletic one. These students always get full scholarships and the only need-based aid they'd ever get would be a Pell Grant...they'd never get institutional financial aid because athletics is supporting them fully.

Other sports are "equivalency" sports, where you have a pot of dollars to give (based on a number of scholarships), but you can divvy them out to as many/few athletes as you like. Academic scholarships do not count against that limit (provided you can show that the scholarship is purely non-athletic in nature and available to all students). Probably more importantly, lots of these students are eligible for need-based financial aid (again, as long as the rules are the same as for everyone else)...in the equivalency sports, it makes sense to use institutional need-based aid, because it does "save" you athletic scholarship $$$.

So a poor star soccer player can potentially go to Stanford for free without using any of the athletic scholarship money...while he/she would probably require use of at least a half of the allotted athletic scholarship $$ at VT.

They are absolutely using non-athletic aid in place of athletic aid...which anyone can, but they have much more capacity to do so. As for "2X the total scholarships" that kind of depends on semantics of whether you consider need-based aid as "scholarship"...if you do, I have zero doubt that a school like Stanford is giving out 2x what VT is (probably a lot higher than that)

(In response to this post by 2hhoop3)

Posted: 12/15/2017 at 09:56AM



+1

Insert a Link

Enter the title of the link here:


Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:


Current Thread:
  Is that a first? ** -- HokieR 12/11/2017 07:18AM
  Pretty sure ** -- squarerootofone 12/11/2017 8:39PM
  Affordability ** -- WestEndHokie39 12/13/2017 09:25AM
  Stanford has a big advantage... -- HokieJack 12/10/2017 10:33PM
  The endowment... -- 2hhoop3 12/11/2017 7:23PM
  Deleted** -- Bentwood Apartments 12/12/2017 10:12AM
  It's a pretty big difference -- Pylons 12/15/2017 06:50AM
  Re: It's a pretty big difference -- 2hhoop3 12/15/2017 09:15AM
  I think you're selling the advantage short -- Pylons 12/15/2017 09:56AM
  Re: I think you're selling the advantage short -- 2hhoop3 12/15/2017 10:13AM
  How do you explain baseball.... -- 2hhoop3 12/15/2017 11:49AM
  Sorry, I guess my answer was incomplete -- Pylons 12/15/2017 12:00PM
  But yet... -- 2hhoop3 12/15/2017 1:27PM
  We do have data -- Pylons 12/15/2017 10:00PM
  Re: We do have data -- 2hhoop3 12/16/2017 09:00AM
  Fair enough. I do have data about the potential -- Pylons 12/18/2017 1:14PM
  Even if the roster sizes end up being... -- Bentwood Apartments 12/15/2017 5:53PM
  Re: Even if the roster sizes end up being... -- 2hhoop3 12/15/2017 9:33PM
  Okpala didn't get "academic money" ** -- Pylons 12/15/2017 11:48AM
  They can give lots of need-based money though -- Pylons 12/15/2017 11:30AM
  Harvard is also in that category...one would think -- EDGEMAN 12/13/2017 11:12AM
  44,000 applicants and they accepted 2000. They only -- wc hokie 12/12/2017 3:44PM
  I still believe that attitude and commitment matter -- VT_Alum2x 12/12/2017 11:26PM
  Sure attitude and commitment matter -- Pylons 12/15/2017 12:30PM

Shop Our TSL Affiliate Links!


Our Sponsors








vm307