As long as there are a dirty dozen humans selecting 4, 6,8 it

Will always be corrupt or at the very least biased on sentiment. best course of action would be to bad the committee use both polls with lots of biased humans but keep the 12 or so computer rankings including those with SOS to eliminate credit for playing the Mercers of college football.

In response to this post by Stech

Posted: 12/07/2017 at 09:03AM

Joel Klatt, "the College Football Playoff is borderline corrupt" (LINK) -- Stech 12/06/2017 08:07AM

As long as there are a dirty dozen humans selecting 4, 6,8 it -- anotherdamnyankeehokie 12/07/2017 09:03AM

Re: Joel Klatt, -- SoCloseHokie 12/07/2017 08:05AM

I would go to 6 teams- All 5 conference champions and one from all other -- hokiego 12/06/2017 4:25PM

Sure, but expanding the playoffs is stupid. -- crabcake77 12/06/2017 3:24PM

5 conference champs + wildcard (best available) imo. -- BAMRising 12/06/2017 5:30PM

Guessing the SEC will get 3-4 teams every year with that arrangement -- EDGEMAN 12/06/2017 4:24PM

If you go to just conference champions... -- The_VT_Rock 12/06/2017 1:34PM

Why not add just one game to cover all P5 winners -- gmuhokie 12/06/2017 11:53AM

That makes the actual selection more objective -- Pylons 12/06/2017 12:21PM

Agree. Nothing's perfect. -- gmuhokie 12/06/2017 11:58PM

Re: Joel Klatt, -- Vippie1 12/06/2017 09:28AM

Of course, if you buy into Klatt, expanding to 8 is -- Pylons 12/06/2017 11:36AM

Re: Of course, if you buy into Klatt, expanding to 8 is -- Vippie1 12/06/2017 1:34PM

As long as there are a dirty dozen humans selecting 4, 6,8 it

Insert a Link

Tech Sideline is Presented By:

Our Sponsors