All Hokie, All the Time. Period.

Conference Realignment Board


Joined: 8/25/05 Posts: 12193
Likes: 1536

That makes the actual selection more objective

to be sure.

but it just shifts the the opinion is that "conference championship is all that matters," which is fine, but still somewhat subjective.

If you go to that model, what happens to OOC scheduling? At that point, the results of your OOC don't matter from an NC perspective, so the temptation would be to schedule Mercer, Citadel, and Delaware St., so that you could rest. Or would the temptation be to schedule Oklahoma, Clemson, and tOSU, so that you could sell tickets, keep donors happy, get prepared for top competition, and not really care much if you win/lose (from an NC perspective anyway)?

(In response to this post by gmuhokie)

Posted: 12/06/2017 at 12:21PM


Insert a Link

Enter the title of the link here:

Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:

Current Thread:
  As long as there are a dirty dozen humans selecting 4, 6,8 it -- anotherdamnyankeehokie 12/07/2017 09:03AM
  Re: Joel Klatt, -- SoCloseHokie 12/07/2017 08:05AM
  Sure, but expanding the playoffs is stupid. -- crabcake77 12/06/2017 3:24PM
  If you go to just conference champions... -- The_VT_Rock 12/06/2017 1:34PM
  Why not add just one game to cover all P5 winners -- gmuhokie 12/06/2017 11:53AM
  That makes the actual selection more objective -- Pylons 12/06/2017 12:21PM
  Agree. Nothing's perfect. -- gmuhokie 12/06/2017 11:58PM
  Re: Joel Klatt, -- Vippie1 12/06/2017 09:28AM

Support TSL by Shopping at Amazon

Our Sponsors