Re: Sorry WADR, not true, may even take someone else before them.

Like I have said in my post. It is not same Irish as past. In my eye it is layered depth of talent. Sure they ran table few years back. Would that team in a conference? Very doubtful. Well put them in league and compete for something. I have feeling the Irish would get right quick. Plus they could probably get a big time coach finally. Now, why would a big time coach be more inclined to be in a conference? Simple math. Access to the NATTY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
[Post edited by SoCloseHokie at 07/18/2017 07:30AM]

In response to this post by Stech

Posted: 07/18/2017 at 07:30AM

Swofford: The ACC membership will in 2036 look a lot like it does today -- HOO86 07/17/2017 11:48AM

Re: Swofford: The ACC membership will in 2036 look a lot like it does today -- Millpoint 07/17/2017 3:19PM

They will wait forever than 20 years after forever. -- goldendomer 07/18/2017 07:49AM

Re: They will wait forever than 20 years after forever. -- Vippie1 07/18/2017 11:16AM

Think Domer was referencing the CFP, not ACC -- East Cobb Hokie 07/18/2017 12:57PM

Concur on both sides being happy with the current arrangement -- EDGEMAN 07/18/2017 11:40AM

Re: Swofford: The ACC membership will in 2036 look a lot like it does today -- Millpoint 07/17/2017 3:17PM

Sorry WADR, not true, may even take someone else before them. -- Stech 07/18/2017 07:21AM

The status quo works for me just fine -- TerryD 07/18/2017 07:44AM

ACCdoes not need us now, the ACC made a overall poor deal. -- goldendomer 07/18/2017 07:38AM

I think both sides made a good deal -- TerryD 07/18/2017 11:53AM

Two football national Champs in 3 years is pretty good & other ND sports -- Stech 07/18/2017 07:58AM

If that is goal sure. Short term it looks okay -- goldendomer 07/18/2017 08:24AM

It was a great deal for the ACC - not sure why you disagree -- lawhokie 07/18/2017 9:25PM

Re: It was a great deal for the ACC - not sure why you disagree -- SoCloseHokie 07/19/2017 07:09AM

Re: If that is goal sure. Short term it looks okay -- SoCloseHokie 07/18/2017 11:36AM

We disagree today, we will always disagree on this... -- TerryD 07/18/2017 11:39AM

Re: We disagree today, we will always disagree on this... -- SoCloseHokie 07/18/2017 1:05PM

Re: Sorry WADR, not true, may even take someone else before them. -- SoCloseHokie 07/18/2017 07:30AM

ND would only have to decide path if they had a 12-0 or 11-1 year, -- East Cobb Hokie 07/18/2017 1:09PM

Your logic is right -- RTFC 07/19/2017 1:13PM

Your second paragraph is most likely ** -- TerryD 07/20/2017 11:17AM

Re: ND would only have to decide path if they had a 12-0 or 11-1 year, -- SoCloseHokie 07/18/2017 1:47PM

Swofford may. I don't know that it's a good idea. -- HOO86 07/17/2017 3:20PM

I'm still waiting for Wake to pay their $25,000 fine. -- Old Line Hokie 07/17/2017 2:25PM

ACC should be able to deduct it from conference payout. -- HOO86 07/17/2017 2:56PM

I think next ACC Comm should be from the demographic center of ACC -- East Cobb Hokie 07/17/2017 2:31PM

So no one's coming to the ACC...unless they do. :-) -- Stech 07/17/2017 12:14PM

Disagree. -- East Cobb Hokie 07/17/2017 2:29PM

You disagree that Swofford won't say anything until ink is dry? That 's my -- Stech 07/18/2017 07:10AM

Excuse my futile attempt at humor -- East Cobb Hokie 07/18/2017 1:00PM

Even when the ink is dry, Swofford may still wait to make -- VTHokie2000 07/18/2017 10:52AM

Re: Sorry WADR, not true, may even take someone else before them.

Insert a Link

Tech Sideline is Presented By:

Our Sponsors