Seth was anti-Seth; 2010-11 was the only legit snub, but was self-inflicted
Coming off the win against #1 Duke, we got blown out at home by NIT-bound BC, then followed it up with a stinker @Clemson. We had a decent run in the ACCT, but our fate was sealed by how we limped to the finish in the regular season.
Those other NIT years weren't really snubs when you go back and look at our results. We usually had at least one awful loss and/or no great wins. We validated the committee's snub by getting eliminated at home in the NIT all those years, if I recall.
|
(
In response to this post by chuckd4vt)
Posted: 02/28/2017 at 11:19AM