It's not so much what you say, but how you say it. In no particular order:
If I'm interpreting correctly, I guess you mean KB2 is Kendyl. "Parker was a top 100 guard, she left because KB is going to play KB2 over any incoming young guard." Before and during the season, coach said he didn't want to play Kendyl this year, because he didn't think she was ready. Parker left because she and her parents wanted her to start at PG. If a player doesn't want to be here, you let them go (could hurt the locker room and team chemistry). He didn't run her off, which means he wasn't going to "...play KB2 over any incoming young guard." If I remember correctly, he said he wanted her to stay, but she asked out and he released her.
"Further he let Koshuta transfer to JMU." See my remarks re: Parker. If a player doesn't want to be here, you let them go. Again, according to every report I've read, Coach tried to convince her to stay, but she didn't want to.
While everyone knows the bench is short handed, I don't remember Coach "complaining," nor do I remember him insinuating it was DW's fault. Some on this board may have inferred it, but I don't necessarily know Coach implied it.
" He should have plenty of depth as a coach but he doesn't because of the reasons above, that is the truth regardless if you like it or not." The short bench is the truth. The innuendoes you included in your post aren't necessarily the truth, just your opinion.
"In the end everyone sees (sic) they want to see not necessarily the truth." You're espousing just as many opinions in your posts as you accuse the rest of us posting. Every coaching change brings some attrition (i.e., Buzz's first year here at VT), and VT had some attrition.
"Again I ask anyone to tell me how what I have said is incorrect...." I've tried to give a response in this post, supra. However, short of typing in all caps, you will shout every response down. That's why I tried everything I could think of to placate you in my last post. I've tried to ignore you, and after this post will try even harder.
I believe in civil discourse, but you refuse to allow it. The few facts you offer (W/L record to date, players who left, etc.) are accurate, but your characterization of them is what I find inaccurate. Also, your lack of respect for anyone with an opinion different from yours, or who offers a nuanced response to you, comes through loud and clear (i.e., the all caps comment above).
If your posts are meant to beat us into submission, you've been successful (at least for me). I welcomed you, and encouraged you to post. I still do. However, I'll probably tend to ignore you as much as possible, and will try to not respond to you or engage you. Your blunt force approach to posting, repeating the same stats and opinions, ad infinitum, I find off-putting and not conducive to civil discourse.
I'll spend more time on the other boards, because this appears to be the only board on which you post. I would suggest that those who feel as I do, follow suit and simply ignore you. Again, keep posting. Just don't expect me to respond.