What if the 3 yrs is cause UT is leaving the B12 & the LHN is the new ACCN -- hokieninsurance 07/18/2016 11:09PM Yes. ** -- hokieball 07/19/2016 12:22AMInsert a Link
Enter the title of the link here:
Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:
Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:
|
Current Thread:
|
What if the 3 yrs is cause UT is leaving the B12 & the LHN is the new ACCN -- hokieninsurance 07/18/2016 11:09PM Yes. ** -- hokieball 07/19/2016 12:22AM Timing is VERY interesting. Big 12 presidents discuss expansion tomorrow. -- ScottyHeel 07/18/2016 10:16PM Shots fired towards Dallas. -- Red Hokie 07/18/2016 10:51PM That's exactly what I was thinking. ** -- hokieball 07/19/2016 12:18AM Yes it does! I think UT must be headed our way like Stech has hinted before ** -- ScottyHeel 07/18/2016 11:12PM It's hotter in the southwest than the east coast..,they are sweating big -- Stech 07/18/2016 10:19PM Good to hear. It's nice that it won't be the ACC that falters to CR. It's -- ScottyHeel 07/18/2016 10:38PM Really good day for the ACC...stability is assured for a long time to come. ** -- Stech 07/18/2016 10:47PM All is well..... -- TerryD 07/19/2016 06:51AM Glad it's done, stability has been assured. ** -- goldendomer 07/19/2016 06:57AM The only thing that would ever change ND is conference champs only... -- Stech 07/19/2016 07:36AM That is highly unlikely to change so stability seems likely for the next 5 -- goldendomer 07/19/2016 07:41AM I don't think they will ever say "champs only" outright. I do think they -- daveinop 07/19/2016 09:15AM Delete duplicate** -- daveinop 07/19/2016 09:16AM Stability is good, but cold hard cash should be the measure of this deal. ** -- JohnsonCItyHokie 07/18/2016 10:50PM The B1G, SEC and B12 wanted ACC schools, there's a reason they didn't leave -- Stech 07/18/2016 11:10PM The ESPN article had some interesting quotes -- ahokie4u 07/18/2016 10:59PM Will wait to hear about financials before declaring this good news. -- VTBB 07/18/2016 9:36PM ESPN article said several interesting things -- ahokie4u 07/18/2016 10:23PM Three years is a complete joke. What have they been doing for the past -- JohnsonCItyHokie 07/18/2016 9:47PM It could be a couple things. -- VTBB 07/18/2016 9:53PM I ran some numbers on the OTT. Others can tell me if they are realistic... -- JohnsonCItyHokie 07/18/2016 10:16PM From what I have read, there is no subscription - it comes free w/ ESPN -- Colonel Jessup 07/19/2016 10:44AM I'd think they would have overhauled the current contract. -- daveinop 07/19/2016 11:26AM No one would pay $35 a month. ** -- Mr. Touchdown 07/18/2016 11:16PM No. Not a prayer. More like the $5 range, IMO. ** -- reestuart 07/19/2016 09:58AM I would $35 per month is a bargain against ticket and travel costs. -- Byting Gobbler 07/18/2016 11:51PM Not if you can watch football and basketball on traditional ESPN family -- Late 80s Hokie 07/19/2016 10:53AM I used that number because I saw that as a proposed amount in a post here -- JohnsonCItyHokie 07/18/2016 11:21PM Dean Jordan Wasserman Media, look him up...he's all over this agreement. -- Stech 07/18/2016 10:15PM As I said, "it's coming" and "take the long view". That's exactly what our -- Stech 07/18/2016 9:45PMTech Sideline is Presented By:
Our Sponsors
