Yes, that was really interesting. Usually those type of things can

get flushed out in discovery, but this was cleared up in the court with little prep time by the defense. The lawyer that learned / combed the DNA data left the 3rd party DNA expert twisting in the wind. The whole case completely fell apart at that point.

In response to this post by BG Hokie

Posted: 03/23/2016 at 10:44AM

I watched the 30 for 30 on the Duke lacross case. -- Guy LeDouche 03/23/2016 10:32AM

I was living there at the time. Nifong had campaign posters up everywhere. ** -- MikeVT85 03/23/2016 8:32PM

Lives can be ruined now with just accusations. ** -- Hokieesith 03/23/2016 4:50PM

Got my blood boiling watching it -- bulab 03/23/2016 1:12PM

They did mention the one lady reporter who wrote a column early on totally -- VTScanlo 03/23/2016 10:45AM

She did. Don't think Mullah Al or Mullah Jesse did. ** -- RoswellGAHokie 03/23/2016 11:28AM

I always thought there was another dynamic at work -- Vienna_Hokie 03/23/2016 10:42AM

If the DA is caving into that kind of pressure -- Hokie madman 03/23/2016 11:17AM

You should watch it. -- Guy LeDouche 03/23/2016 10:47AM

NC bar found the DA ethically challenged. Disbarred and jailed. -- knuckle junction 03/23/2016 10:47AM

One of my favorite things about that special was how the one defense lawyer -- BG Hokie 03/23/2016 10:37AM

Yes, that was really interesting. Usually those type of things can -- Guy LeDouche 03/23/2016 10:44AM

Yes, that was really interesting. Usually those type of things can

Insert a Link

Tech Sideline is Presented By:

Our Sponsors