All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by

Conference Realignment Board

VTHokie2000

Joined: 01/01/2005 Posts: 33818
Likes: 12458


It is all good because it is fun speculating how all the dominos


might start to fall once the ball gets rolling. Oklahoma could end up being an interesting domino because early reports suggested that Oklahoma only had eyes for the Pac-10 with the eventual plan to for the conference to become the Pac-16. After that deal fell apart reports surfaced that Oklahoma may have 1 eye on the Big Ten. Now reports have started to surface that Oklahoma may be re-thinking its position about the SEC and willing to have 1 eye on that conference too.

It is my understanding that Kansas St, Oklahoma St, and Texas Tech are not considered to be big commodities by the Big Ten, Pac-12, or SEC. If their "big brother" (aka Kansas, Oklahoma, and Texas) are able to workout solo deals for themselves, then I am not sure those 3 conferences have any incentive to take the "little brother." At least the Pac-10 sent a clear message when it was exploring the possibility of becoming the Pac-16 that it wouldn't take Texas Tech without Texas (or possibly Texas A&M prior to Texas A&M's move to the SEC). I am not sure anything has changed for Texas Tech that would influence the Pac-12 to change its position. Oklahoma State is in a little better position because it brings "T. Boone" money to the table, but even that may not be enough to get them into the Pac-16.

As far as the ACC goes, you are correct that the ACC may be the only conference willing to have partial members. Can the ACC's reputation as a power conference afford to add multiple partial members (especially if those members are non-football members)? I could be wrong but it seems that the ACC's reputation took a slight hit when it became "the new Big East of the power conferences" by agreeing to a partial membership with Notre Dame. I am not saying it was the wrong move to make at the time, but I do see why some people think the move had the smell of desperation. If the ACC allows Oklahoma and Texas to join Notre Dame as non-football partial members, then it may become harder for the conference to draw a line in the sand and give those partial members an ultimatum; either join the conference as full members or get out.

(In response to this post by goldendomer)

Posted: 03/22/2016 at 1:09PM



+0

Insert a Link

Enter the title of the link here:


Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:


Current Thread:
  And then there is this tweet -- Mr. Touchdown 03/22/2016 1:12PM
  And this one... -- Mr. Touchdown 03/22/2016 1:11PM
  What's the one move that could kill the Big 12? -- mancunian 03/22/2016 12:52PM
  OSU to the SEC would be a nightmare for OU -- goldendomer 03/22/2016 12:38PM
  The ACC agree with us has worked out well up to a point -- goldendomer 03/22/2016 1:26PM
  If Oklahoma bolts, then WVU will look to bolt too -- VTHokie2000 03/22/2016 1:53PM
  I'm wondering who the genius was that came up -- Maroon Doom 03/22/2016 12:28PM
  Delete** -- goldendomer 03/22/2016 12:47PM

Tech Sideline is Presented By:

Our Sponsors

vm307