All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by

Conference Realignment Board

Joined: 01/05/2001 Posts: 124899
Likes: 40451

100000+ Posts

Subscriber

Board Member 20+ Years

10000 Likes

10000 Likes

10000 Likes

10000 Likes

250 Likes

100 Likes

100 Likes

What's this?

If the B12 still owns OU's media, wouldn't it still have to pay OU...

for those broadcasted games?

Either they own the games, or they do not own the games. The B12 can't get those games for free after OU leaves, right?

(In response to this post by Mizzoufan)

Posted: 02/25/2016 at 2:42PM

+0

PREV NEXT REPLY

Insert a Link

Enter the title of the link here:

Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:

Current Thread:

Mizzou fan here; GOR thoughts -- Mizzoufan 02/24/2016 9:15PM

As 33lazlo99 says below, without the tv contracts in hand -- daveinop 02/26/2016 4:02PM

Interesting - you know having a BIG game on TV as the B12 game of the week -- Mr. Touchdown 02/25/2016 10:47AM

Correct. OU games would be still be Big 12 owned -- Mizzoufan 02/25/2016 11:09AM

Re: Correct. OU games would be still be Big 12 owned -- dayooper 02/25/2016 12:33PM

Because the Big 12 would still own OU's media -- Mizzoufan 02/25/2016 1:07PM

If the B12 still owns OU's media, wouldn't it still have to pay OU... -- EDGEMAN 02/25/2016 2:42PM

Re: If the B12 still owns OU's media, wouldn't it still have to pay OU... -- dayooper 02/25/2016 4:15PM

Exactly, that is how you could end up with the crazy -- Mizzoufan 02/25/2016 4:28PM

Welcome. very interesting view -- ahokie4u 02/24/2016 10:12PM

Thanks for the welcome. nm -- Mizzoufan 02/24/2016 10:20PM

In real life, it comes down to $$$ -- Tailgate Guru 02/24/2016 9:29PM

Re: In real life, it comes down to $$$ -- Mizzoufan 02/24/2016 10:15PM

So if WF left, the ACC would owe them money? -- EDGEMAN 02/25/2016 08:10AM

Probably. The product (available games to be broadcast) would be improved. ** -- Freddyburg Hokie 02/25/2016 12:14PM

Re: In real life, it comes down to $$$ -- 33laszlo99 02/25/2016 03:00AM

That's based upon what happened w/ Maryland. -- chuckd4vt 02/25/2016 02:35AM

A few points... -- ren_hoek 02/25/2016 09:41AM

Also, ACC teams were assured of a network when they signed. -- chuckd4vt 02/25/2016 10:19AM

I'm fairly certain the only thing in writing is w/ the tv contract, not -- Colonel Jessup 02/26/2016 11:11AM

The GOR is not dependent on a network -- ren_hoek 02/25/2016 10:37AM

IMO, the GOR was sold as being necessary in order to obtain the -- seekoHoG 02/25/2016 8:59PM

How do you know? Every report out there suggested it is. ** -- chuckd4vt 02/25/2016 10:44AM

Swofford has specifically stated it ** -- ren_hoek 02/25/2016 10:50AM

Where and when? That would have been discussed on this board. ** -- chuckd4vt 02/25/2016 10:55AM

Don't remember exactly where/when, but -- ren_hoek 02/26/2016 07:11AM

The exit fee didn't fully hold up in court and I doubt a GOR would. -- chuckd4vt 02/25/2016 10:14AM

Wrong as usual -- ren_hoek 02/25/2016 10:39AM

Both Wrong -- 33laszlo99 02/26/2016 03:30AM

Heard same thing about the exit fee. 1.Maryland's gone. 2.Didn't cost $50m. -- chuckd4vt 02/25/2016 10:53AM

One of us doesn't understand a GOR -- ren_hoek 02/25/2016 11:04AM

But wouldn't the old conference have to pay for -- Mizzoufan 02/25/2016 11:15AM

GoR Refresher... -- 33laszlo99 02/26/2016 05:24AM

Re: That's based upon what happened w/ Maryland. -- 33laszlo99 02/25/2016 03:25AM